From the Right

Observing my upside down America

Democrat Party racism legacy

with 7 comments


Certain liberals of late have worked hard to label Tom Tancredo as a racist. The boneless finger pointing comes as a result of recent comment which he made at a Sarah Palin gathering where he spoke to the audience. The liberals use his comments about the number of uneducated voters who cannot speak English as their evidence.

I do not support Tancredo, but I find it difficult to leap to the same conclusion. While the Dems cry long and hard, getting their panties in a wad and frothing at the mouth while casting this baseless accusation, they have no problems affiliating themselves with a political party whose legacy on racism is appalling.

If liberals actually believed in what they spew, they would distance themselves from it, but they won’t.

So, let’s look back at the Republican Party’s record.

Mississippi Senator Trent Lott recently stepped down from his post as Senate Majority Leader because of racially offensive comments which he made. He was persuaded to take this step by Republicans who believed that his comments were at odds with the principles of their party.

Being the hypocrites they are, Democrats used the Lott affair to paint Republicans as racists. Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, who had first dismissed the idea that Sen. Lott was a racist, later claimed that his stepping down did not really address the Republican Party’s inherent racism. “Republicans have to prove, not only to us, of course, but to the American people that they are as sensitive to this question of racism, this question of civil rights, this question of equal opportunity, as they say they are,” Senator Daschle said. Among high-profile Democrats, Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer offered similar comments.

Makes ya wanna puke, doesn’t it?

In both principle and practice, the Republican Party has a far better record than the Democrats on race. Even more importantly, historically and enduring even today, the Democratic position represents racism of the most offensive sort—a patronizing racism that denigrates Blacks every bit as badly as the old racism of Jim Crow and segregation.

The Republican Party was founded on the basis of principles invoked by Abraham Lincoln who often referred to the Declaration of Independence. It can be said the principles of the Republican Party are the principles of the nation. Those principles clearly state that people have rights and that the only role of government is to protect the rights of its citizens. They are the rights invoked by the Declaration of Independence—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—not happiness, but the pursuit of happiness.

The Republican Party was created in response to a crisis arising from the fact that American public opinion on the issue of slavery had drifted away from the principles of the Founding. While the Founders had tolerated slavery out of necessity, many Americans, especially within the Democratic Party, had come to accept the idea that slavery was a “positive good.” While Thomas Jefferson, the founder of what evolved into the Democratic Party, had argued that slavery was bad not only for the slave but also for the slave owner, John C. Calhoun, had turned this principle on its head: slavery was good not only for the slave holder, but also for the slave.

In the 1920s, the Republican Party platform routinely called for anti-lynching legislation. The Democrats rejected such calls in their own platforms. When FDR forged the New Deal, he was able to pry Blacks away from their traditional attachment to the Party of Lincoln. But they remained in their dependent status, Democrats by virtue of political expediency, not principle.

When Strom Thurmond, the praise of whom landed Sen. Lott in hot water, ran a segregationist campaign in 1948, he ran as a Dixie-CRAT, not a Dixie-CAN. When he lost, he went back to being a Democrat. He only repudiated his segregationist views when he later became a Republican.

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.

Indeed, the case of Sen. Byrd is instructive when it comes to the double standard applied to the two parties when it comes to race. Even those Democrats who have exploited the Lott affair acknowledge that he is no racist. Can the same be said about Sen. Byrd, who was a member of the KKK and who recently used the “n” word on national TV?

“Ah, but this is all in the past,” say the Democrats. “Now we push a pro-African-American agenda.” But the reality differs significantly from the claim.

Take the issue of education. The single biggest obstacle to the achievement of true equality in the United States is not poverty, but education. If Democrats sincerely wished to help the minority children on whose behalf they claim to labor, they would embrace school choice to help such children escape the trap of sub-standard schools. But that would offend the teachers’ unions upon which the Democrats depend for financial and “in-kind” support. So as has often been the case with the group politics of the Democratic party, African-American interests are sacrificed to other groups who have more pull.

“Affirmative action” has become the touchstone of Democratic racial politics. Democrats portray anyone who opposes affirmative action as racist. But affirmative action, as currently practiced, is racist to the core. It is based on the assumption that African-Americans are incapable of competing with whites. It represents the kind of paternalistic racism that would have done honor to Calhoun. For the modern liberal Democratic racist as for the old-fashioned one, blacks are simply incapable of freedom. They will always need Ol’ Massa’s help. And woe be to any African-American who wanders off of the Democratic plantation. Ask Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, or Ward Connerly. Although they echo the call for a “color-blind society” that once characterized the vision of Martin Luther King Jr., they are pilloried as “Uncle Toms” of “Oreos” by such enforcers of the Democratic plantation system as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.

If we need the perfect symbol for the true character of the Democratic Party when it comes to race, we need look no farther than Rhode Island Congressman Patrick Kennedy. Rep. Kennedy portrays himself as a friend of African-Americans. But his touching solicitude for African-Americans as a group is gross hypocrisy. When inconvenienced by a real African-American woman trying to do her job, Rep. Kennedy shoved her out of his way, giving her arm a yank for good measure. In practice, the Democratic Party as a whole cares as much about real African-Americans as Rep. Kennedy does.

Advertisements

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Never, never let Liberals get away with calling Conservatives racist. Liberals support unrestricted abortions, which crush and dismember black human beings at a rate three times that of whites. The location of abortuaries is no coincidence. If that isn’t racism, what is?

    Neil

    February 17, 2010 at 8:54 pm

  2. Hmmmm Im surprised the race baiting drone hasnt commented yet.

    Elric66

    February 18, 2010 at 8:14 am

  3. Ben – of course, you do know that following the passage of civil rights legislation that a slew of “Dixiecrats” became Republicans – either in name or in voting patterns. That was the heart of Nixon’s Southern Strategy, and the heart of Reagan’s “Reagan Democrat” block.

    — hp

    hippieprof

    February 21, 2010 at 7:17 pm

  4. Yes, and those Dems who infiltrated the Rep party brought their sick thinking with them. In the end, the Reps viewed their approach to campaigning as wrong and stated so.

    While that particular campaign strategy was abandoned, it should be remembered that it was just that – a campaign strategy – and cannot be compared to the policies of the Dems, including T. Roosevelt, who believed African Americans were inferior to White Americans, Johnson, Gov. Wallace, et. al.

    While the Rep’s record is not totally clean, history will continue to show it is far better than the Dem’s. The policies and laws of the Dems, i.e. welfare, serve only to keep poor and under prepared Americans, half of which are Black Americans, dependent upon the Dems. Over generations these policies have served to develop that infamous entitlement mentality.

    Over the period between 1970 and 1987, expenditures on welfare programs grew by over 224%. Analysts have calculated welfare equivalent wages for the six most common social programs for each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. They assert that individuals who choose public assistance over work are responding rationally to incentives of the welfare system. Evidence has shown statistically significant support for these assertions. Among potential welfare recipients, a one dollar increase in the welfare equivalent wage is found to increase the welfare take-up rate by approximately 2.7 percentage points and decrease the labor force participation rate by approximately 2.5 percentage points.

    While Otto Von Bismarck created the first model of welfare, FDR, a hero to large minority groups, especially African-Americans, changed it to fit the United States. When Roosevelt needed the support of Southern Democrats for his New Deal programs, he decided not to push for anti-lynching legislation that might threaten his ability to pass his highest priority programs.

    These policies are evil and are the brain-child of the racist Democratic Party.

    Ben

    February 21, 2010 at 8:37 pm

  5. Ben, you are confusing the name of the party with the political philosophy of the party. Indeed, the Republican party is the party of Lincoln – and as such it is difficult to say that Republicans were the racists in 1863. Southern Democrats in fact were the founders of the KKK – after their defeat in the civil war they weren’t about to become Republicans, after all. You are correct that the southern branch of the Democratic party indeed has a sorry history.

    But a political party is different from a political philosophy. You would be wrong to suggest, that racism has even been a LIBERAL idea. Indeed, Democrats have not always been liberal. Racists, on the other hand, are not liberal in their political philosophy and never have been.

    — hp

    hippieprof

    February 21, 2010 at 9:06 pm

  6. Took the race baiter long enough.

    Ohhh and Ben, dont confuses libs with progressives. The racist progressives took the mantle of liberal when they were ran underground.

    Elric66

    February 22, 2010 at 5:57 am

  7. I guess you quit blogging Ben.

    Elric66

    March 28, 2010 at 8:29 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: